Ain-Shams Journal of Anaesthesiology

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2013  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 175--179

Comparison of hypertonic saline (3%), normal saline (0.9%), and hydroxyethyl starch (6%) for prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section


Sahar M. Talaat, Fahmy S. Latif, Mahmoud H. Mohammed 
 Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

Correspondence Address:
Sahar M. Talaat
MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, 11566 Cairo
Egypt

Aim

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of hypertonic saline (HS) (3%) (4 ml/kg), normal saline (NS) (0.9%) (13 ml/kg), and hydroxyethyl starch (HES) (6%) in the prevention of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.

Patients and methods

Sixty healthy parturients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were included in this randomized prospective study. The patients were randomly assigned to receive 4 ml/kg of HS (3%) (group HS: n=20), 13 ml/kg of NS (0.9%) (group NS: n=20), or 500 ml of HES (6%) (group HES: n=20) before spinal anesthesia. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured before preloading, after preloading, and after spinal injection throughout the procedure. Hypotension was treated with intravenous boluses of 5 mg of ephedrine. Serum sodium levels were measured before and after fluid preloading and after 30 and 90 min. The neonatal outcome was assessed using the APGAR scoring system.

Results

Two patients (10%) in the HS group, six patients (30%) in the HES group, and 13 patients (65%) in the NS group experienced hypotension, thus the incidence of hypotension was significantly lower in the former two groups. The total dose of ephedrine required by the HS and the HES group was significantly lower compared with that required by the NS group. The heart rate showed no significant differences among the three groups throughout the procedure. Serum sodium concentrations showed no significant differences between the three groups before preloading, after preloading, and after 30 and 90 min. There were no significant changes in each group during the study period. The neonatal outcome was excellent in all three groups.

Conclusion

HS (3%) at a dose of 4 ml/kg is a safe, inexpensive, and effective preloading fluid in parturients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia for the prophylaxis against hypotension. HS (3%) can be recommended for fluid preloading in situations in which excess free water administration is not required.




How to cite this article:
Talaat SM, Latif FS, Mohammed MH. Comparison of hypertonic saline (3%), normal saline (0.9%), and hydroxyethyl starch (6%) for prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.Ain-Shams J Anaesthesiol 2013;6:175-179


How to cite this URL:
Talaat SM, Latif FS, Mohammed MH. Comparison of hypertonic saline (3%), normal saline (0.9%), and hydroxyethyl starch (6%) for prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Ain-Shams J Anaesthesiol [serial online] 2013 [cited 2022 Aug 10 ];6:175-179
Available from: http://www.asja.eg.net/article.asp?issn=1687-7934;year=2013;volume=6;issue=2;spage=175;epage=179;aulast=Talaat;type=0